In our Riga to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 639 minutes, completing the 1001km route in 21h 8min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 8min (639 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~163 kWh
- Distance: 1001km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
21h 8min |
31h 47min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
2h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~252 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lauku iela (10 min, 65% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (10 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 13% → 58%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K (12 min, 25% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
K-Supermarket Mankkaa (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Ykkös Cafe (24 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (29 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Circle K (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's Hagalundsvägen (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Töcksfors Handelspark (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 639-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1001km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 2h 7min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons