In our Riga to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 105 minutes, completing the 1000km route in 20h 58min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 58min (105 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~156 kWh
- Distance: 1000km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
20h 58min |
22h 43min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
1h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~189 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 13% → 56%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lauku iela (24 min, 60% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
Helgesons väg (10 min, 10% → 12%)
-
Stop 3:
Circle K Hammarby Sjöstad (10 min, 11% → 19%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Genetaleden (14 min, 11% → 36%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Dinners (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's Hagalundsvägen (26 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 105-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 1000km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 1h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~156 kWh vs ~188 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons