In our Riga to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro LR by 82 minutes, completing the 1000km route in 20h 58min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 58min (82 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~156 kWh
- Distance: 1000km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR |
| Travel time |
20h 58min |
22h 20min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
1h 44min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~181 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 13% → 56%)
- Arrival: Oslo
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lauku iela (57 min, 50% → 98%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Hagalundsvägen (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Töcksfors Handelspark (10 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 82-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro LR on this 1000km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 1h 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~156 kWh vs ~221 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons