In our Riga to Oslo EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 32 minutes, completing the 1000km route in 21h 21min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 21min (32 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~184 kWh
- Distance: 1000km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
21h 21min |
21h 53min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
1h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~180 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rimi Lāčplēša iela (20 min, 61% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Hagalundsvägen (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lauku iela (39 min, 50% → 97%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K Västhaga (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Preem Grums (15 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 32-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 1000km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 1h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons