In our Riga to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Genesis Electrified G80 by 58 minutes, completing the 2082km route in 22h 40min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 40min (58 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 18min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 2082km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Genesis Electrified G80 |
| Travel time |
22h 40min |
23h 38min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
2h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (14 min, 57% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Remscheid West (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Genesis Electrified G80 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (32 min, 44% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (17 min, 11% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dopiewiec (13 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (12 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (14 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
Autohaus Weber (11 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (14 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (11 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 58-minute advantage over Genesis Electrified G80 on this 2082km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 18min vs 2h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~400 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons