In our Riga to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the VW ID.4 Pro 2023 by 118 minutes, completing the 2082km route in 22h 40min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 40min (118 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 18min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 2082km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
VW ID.4 Pro 2023 |
| Travel time |
22h 40min |
24h 38min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
3h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (14 min, 57% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Remscheid West (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
VW ID.4 Pro 2023 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kulturos centras (36 min, 41% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (14 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Żnin Zachód (12 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Walewice (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 10:
Remscheid West (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Bierset (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 12:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (19 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 118-minute advantage over VW ID.4 Pro 2023 on this 2082km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 18min vs 3h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~364 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons