In our Riga to Prague EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 75 minutes, completing the 1288km route in 14h 46min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 46min (75 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 58min
- Energy: ~231 kWh
- Distance: 1288km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 46min |
16h 1min |
| Charging time: |
58min |
1h 56min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~232 kWh |
~233 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (24 min, 35% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Na Półboru (14 min, 12% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
ALDI (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Prague
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Norfa XL (19 min, 18% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 29%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell (10 min, 19% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Bolimów (13 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Hotel Na Półboru (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Orlen Michałowice Północ (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
ALDI (20 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 75-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1288km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 58min vs 1h 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons