In our Riga to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 117 minutes, completing the 2112km route in 24h 36min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 36min (117 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 38min
- Energy: ~345 kWh
- Distance: 2112km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
24h 36min |
26h 33min |
| Charging time: |
1h 38min |
3h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 13% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 76% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (29 min, 13% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Promna-Kolonia (14 min, 26% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV smer Beograd (53 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 10:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (28 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 117-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2112km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 38min vs 3h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~345 kWh vs ~472 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons