In our Riga to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Mercedes-Benz EQV 300 by 326 minutes, completing the 2112km route in 24h 36min. The key advantage? 9 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 15 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 36min (326 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 38min
- Energy: ~345 kWh
- Distance: 2112km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Mercedes-Benz EQV 300 |
| Travel time |
24h 36min |
30h 2min |
| Charging time: |
1h 38min |
6h 6min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
15 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 13% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Mercedes-Benz EQV 300 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 68% → 87%)
-
Stop 2:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (13 min, 11% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (34 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell (12 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 6:
Factory Annopol (35 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell MOP West (21 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Biedronka Połomskiego (27 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 9:
Kaufland Wolkera (39 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 10:
Tesco (25 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (44 min, 10% → 93%)
-
Stop 12:
OMV smer Beograd (21 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 13:
JP Putevi Srbije (37 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 14:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (26 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 15:
OMV (12 min, 10% → 31%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 326-minute advantage over Mercedes-Benz EQV 300 on this 2112km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 15 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 38min vs 6h 6min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~345 kWh vs ~569 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons