In our Riga to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 222 minutes, completing the 2112km route in 24h 36min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 14 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 36min (222 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 38min
- Energy: ~345 kWh
- Distance: 2112km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
MG MG4 64kWh |
| Travel time |
24h 36min |
28h 18min |
| Charging time: |
1h 38min |
4h 39min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
14 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~382 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 13% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Norfa XL (28 min, 13% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (25 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell (10 min, 15% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
KOMO (21 min, 15% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell MOP West (12 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Połomskiego (18 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland Wolkera (31 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 9:
Tesco (15 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 11:
OMV Backa Topola jug (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 12:
OMV smer Beograd (23 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 13:
Gazprom (32 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 14:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (26 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 222-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 2112km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 14 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 38min vs 4h 39min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~345 kWh vs ~358 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons