In our Riga to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Skoda ENYAQ 85 by 103 minutes, completing the 2110km route in 24h 22min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 22min (103 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 26min
- Energy: ~328 kWh
- Distance: 2110km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Skoda ENYAQ 85 |
| Travel time |
24h 22min |
26h 5min |
| Charging time: |
1h 26min |
3h 6min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 47% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (14 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (23 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Skoda ENYAQ 85 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (29 min, 13% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (16 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell MOP West (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Lotników (28 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesco (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (22 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV smer Beograd (43 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 8:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 103-minute advantage over Skoda ENYAQ 85 on this 2110km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 26min vs 3h 6min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~328 kWh vs ~369 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons