In our Riga to Sofia EV duel, the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric beats the Audi e-tron GT by 154 minutes, completing the 2116km route in 23h 59min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
Despite costing 34,060 less, the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric beats the Audi e-tron GT by 154 minutes on this route.
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric
- Total time: 23h 59min (154 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 7min
- Energy: ~366 kWh
- Distance: 2116km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric |
| Travel time |
26h 33min |
23h 59min |
| Charging time: |
3h 22min |
1h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~381 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 76% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (29 min, 13% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Promna-Kolonia (14 min, 26% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV smer Beograd (53 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 10:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (28 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 74% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Ekoen Atrium Reduta (14 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
Centrum rekreacji i wypoczynku Hawrań (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Ledi MS (17 min, 10% → 77%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Won
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric achieved a 154-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2116km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 7min vs 3h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~366 kWh vs ~473 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons