In our Riga to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 44 minutes, completing the 2147km route in 25h 15min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 15min (44 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 10min
- Energy: ~385 kWh
- Distance: 2147km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
25h 59min |
25h 15min |
| Charging time: |
2h 15min |
2h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~386 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (21 min, 37% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (16 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco Teplická cesta (21 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (17 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 6:
Ledi MS (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (27 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Route 80 (10 min, 10% → 36%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (24 min, 35% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Promna-Kolonia (10 min, 38% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (21 min, 15% → 79%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (19 min, 12% → 79%)
-
Stop 7:
JP Putevi Srbije (36 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 44-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2147km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 10min vs 2h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~385 kWh vs ~394 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons