In our Riga to Vienna EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 5 minutes, completing the 1325km route in 14h 44min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance's 524km range doesn't beat the Audi Q6 e-tron performance's 512km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 44min (5 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 57min
- Energy: ~243 kWh
- Distance: 1325km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
14h 44min |
14h 49min |
| Charging time: |
57min |
1h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~239 kWh |
~238 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (21 min, 37% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Hotel Porto (16 min, 15% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
Mořice Bistro (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (24 min, 35% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 4:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Mořice Bistro (10 min, 11% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 5-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1325km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 57min vs 1h 7min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons