In our Riga to Vienna EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 68 minutes, completing the 1324km route in 14h 49min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 49min (68 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 7min
- Energy: ~238 kWh
- Distance: 1324km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 49min |
15h 57min |
| Charging time: |
1h 7min |
2h 0min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~238 kWh |
~239 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (24 min, 35% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 4:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Mořice Bistro (10 min, 11% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Norfa XL (19 min, 18% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (14 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Hotel Górski (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
Uniwar P1 (21 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 8:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (12 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 68-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1324km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 7min vs 2h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons