In our Riga to Vienna EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 50 minutes, completing the 1324km route in 14h 49min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 49min (50 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 7min
- Energy: ~238 kWh
- Distance: 1324km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 49min |
15h 39min |
| Charging time: |
1h 7min |
1h 55min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~238 kWh |
~243 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (24 min, 35% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 4:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Mořice Bistro (10 min, 11% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (13 min, 50% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (32 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Fabryczna (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Nowostawy (18 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
Uniwar P1 (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (12 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 50-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1324km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 7min vs 1h 55min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons