In our Riga to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 64 minutes, completing the 1629km route in 18h 52min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 52min (64 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~254 kWh
- Distance: 1629km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
18h 52min |
19h 56min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
1h 56min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~293 kWh |
~293 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 47% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Zachód (13 min, 22% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 76% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (29 min, 13% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel Górski (10 min, 11% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Mosonmagyaróvár Süd (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV (13 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 64-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 1629km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 1h 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~254 kWh vs ~364 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons