In our Riga to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 34 minutes, completing the 1632km route in 19h 13min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 13min (34 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~300 kWh
- Distance: 1632km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
19h 13min |
19h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
1h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~294 kWh |
~294 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (21 min, 37% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Hotel Porto (16 min, 15% → 74%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (17 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 76% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (30 min, 11% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel Górski (10 min, 11% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dobieszowice Zachód (15 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Signalbau (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
Mosonmagyaróvár Süd (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV (13 min, 11% → 57%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 34-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 1632km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 1h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons