In our Rome to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 7 minutes, completing the 1631km route in 16h 39min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 39min (7 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 46min
- Energy: ~254 kWh
- Distance: 1631km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 46min |
16h 39min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
46min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~294 kWh |
~294 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Secchia Est (11 min, 24% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Lavorgo Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Eggberg A2 (10 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Pfälzer Weinstraße Ost (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 15% → 59%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 36% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Lavorgo Nord (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Norma (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Moseltal Ost (14 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 7-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 1631km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 46min vs 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~254 kWh vs ~266 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons