In our Rome to Berlin EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 46 minutes, completing the 1507km route in 14h 55min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 55min (46 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 0min
- Energy: ~277 kWh
- Distance: 1507km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
14h 55min |
15h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 0min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~271 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Campogalliano Est (21 min, 13% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Green Deer Bavarian Hotel (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Via del Lago (15 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Povegliano Est (16 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Langenbruck A9 (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Hecht Einrichtungen (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 46-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1507km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 0min vs 1h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons