In our Rome to Berlin EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 26 minutes, completing the 1486km route in 14h 57min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 57min (26 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 54min
- Energy: ~267 kWh
- Distance: 1486km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
14h 57min |
15h 23min |
| Charging time: |
54min |
1h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~267 kWh |
~272 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Secchia Est (14 min, 12% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Raststätte Kostner (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Esso Tankstelle Ungererstraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Hecht Einrichtungen (10 min, 23% → 63%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Via del Lago (10 min, 21% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Povegliano Est (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Raststation Europabrücke (14 min, 18% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (17 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 7:
Total Autohof Leipzig Flughafen (12 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 26-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 1486km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 54min vs 1h 27min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~267 kWh vs ~332 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons