In our Rome to Berlin EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 2 minutes, completing the 1487km route in 15h 58min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 9 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 15h 58min (2 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 1h 59min
- Energy: ~234 kWh
- Distance: 1487km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 0min |
15h 58min |
| Charging time: |
1h 58min |
1h 59min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~268 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 24% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 16% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Povegliano Est (19 min, 11% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Al Tornante Panorama Restaurant & Pizzeria (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
REWE Nymphenburger Straße (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 8:
Rastplatz Sophienberg Ost (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
Hecht Einrichtungen (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 10:
TotalEnergies Autohof (11 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 24% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 17% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Povegliano Est (18 min, 12% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Al Tornante Panorama Restaurant & Pizzeria (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
Hecht Einrichtungen (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 2-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1487km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~234 kWh vs ~236 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons