In our Rome to Berlin EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Performance beats the Tesla Model X 75 by 387 minutes, completing the 1494km route in 15h 9min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model Y Performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Performance
- Total time: 15h 9min (387 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 15min
- Energy: ~273 kWh
- Distance: 1494km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model X 75 |
Tesla Model Y Performance |
| Travel time |
21h 36min |
15h 9min |
| Charging time: |
6h 53min |
1h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
11 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~269 kWh |
~272 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model X 75 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Fabro Est (13 min, 38% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
ABB E-mobility (61 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Hotel Real Fini Baia Del Re (26 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesla Supercharger (16 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger B&B Hotel (28 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Raststätte Lanz - Brenner (32 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 7:
EnBW Restaurant und Golfclub Bergkramerhof (23 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 8:
Fürholzen Ost (61 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 9:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (40 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 10:
Frankenwald Ost (58 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 11:
Burger King Autohof Bitterfeld (55 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Tesla Model Y Performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Povegliano Est (10 min, 21% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Raststation Europabrücke (10 min, 28% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Burger King Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf (15 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Tesla Model Y Performance Won
The Tesla Model Y Performance achieved a 387-minute advantage over Tesla Model X 75 on this 1494km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 15min vs 6h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~273 kWh vs ~388 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons