In our Rome to Berlin EV duel, the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 beats the Tesla Model Y Performance by 24 minutes, completing the 1485km route in 14h 45min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025
- Total time: 14h 45min (24 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~316 kWh
- Distance: 1485km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 |
Tesla Model Y Performance |
| Travel time |
14h 45min |
15h 9min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
1h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~267 kWh |
~272 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (13 min, 15% → 84%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Raststätte Kostner (10 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
Esso Tankstelle Ungererstraße (10 min, 25% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
EnBW Euro Rastpark (11 min, 17% → 85%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Tesla Model Y Performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Povegliano Est (10 min, 21% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Raststation Europabrücke (10 min, 28% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Burger King Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf (15 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 Won
The XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 achieved a 24-minute advantage over Tesla Model Y Performance on this 1485km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 1h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons