In our Rome to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 35 minutes, completing the 855km route in 9h 17min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 17min (35 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~140 kWh
- Distance: 855km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 17min |
9h 52min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
51min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~154 kWh |
~154 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 32% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (10 min, 28% → 66%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 29% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Secchia Est (15 min, 11% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
ACW Auto-Center Visp (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 35-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 855km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~140 kWh vs ~141 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons