In our Rome to Bern EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 17 minutes, completing the 860km route in 9h 57min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 9h 57min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~136 kWh
- Distance: 860km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
10h 14min |
9h 57min |
| Charging time: |
1h 9min |
56min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~155 kWh |
~154 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (11 min, 19% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (12 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
Roadhouse (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (24 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
ACW Auto-Center Visp (11 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (11 min, 24% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Secchia Est (17 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
ACW Auto-Center Visp (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 17-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 860km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 1h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~136 kWh vs ~146 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons