In our Rome to Bern EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 40 minutes, completing the 857km route in 9h 20min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023
- Total time: 9h 20min (40 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 24min
- Energy: ~129 kWh
- Distance: 857km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 |
| Travel time |
10h 0min |
9h 20min |
| Charging time: |
59min |
24min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~154 kWh |
~154 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 24% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Secchia Est (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
ACW Auto-Center Visp (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Bern
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (11 min, 53% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Free To X Villoresi Est (13 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 Won
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 achieved a 40-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 857km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 24min vs 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~129 kWh vs ~136 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons