In our Rome to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 9 minutes, completing the 1130km route in 11h 29min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 29min (9 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 32min
- Energy: ~184 kWh
- Distance: 1130km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
11h 29min |
11h 38min |
| Charging time: |
32min |
37min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~203 kWh |
~204 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (14 min, 17% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Billa Töschling (18 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (15 min, 15% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Electrip Le Valli Di Carnia (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 9-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1130km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 32min vs 37min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~184 kWh vs ~203 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons