In our Rome to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range by 23 minutes, completing the 1130km route in 11h 29min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 29min (23 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 32min
- Energy: ~184 kWh
- Distance: 1130km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range |
| Travel time |
11h 29min |
11h 52min |
| Charging time: |
32min |
52min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~203 kWh |
~204 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (14 min, 17% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Billa Töschling (18 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 22% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (16 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Autobahnraststation Marché Wörthersee (13 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Raststation Kapfenberg Süd (13 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 23-minute advantage over Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range on this 1130km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 32min vs 52min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons