In our Rome to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 60 minutes, completing the 1450km route in 14h 58min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 58min (60 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~237 kWh
- Distance: 1450km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
14h 58min |
15h 58min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
1h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~261 kWh |
~262 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Secchia Est (11 min, 24% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Lavorgo Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Eggberg A2 (11 min, 24% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY E. Leclerc (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Via del Lago (14 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Roadhouse (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Free To X Villoresi Est (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Lavorgo Nord (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Eggberg A2 (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Aire du Haut Koenigsbourg (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Keskastel Est (12 min, 12% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Shopping Cora (18 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 60-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1450km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~237 kWh vs ~240 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons