In our Rome to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi RS e-tron GT by 108 minutes, completing the 1853km route in 22h 1min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 1min (108 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 2h 5min
- Energy: ~302 kWh
- Distance: 1853km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi RS e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
22h 1min |
23h 49min |
| Charging time: |
2h 5min |
3h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~334 kWh |
~337 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (12 min, 15% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Martinci (21 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (72 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi RS e-tron GT Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (11 min, 31% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Adige Est (13 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (10 min, 17% → 26%)
-
Stop 5:
Petrol (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (14 min, 11% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesla Supercharger (19 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (23 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (65 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Pitesti Retail Park (10 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 108-minute advantage over Audi RS e-tron GT on this 1853km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 5min vs 3h 5min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~302 kWh vs ~414 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons