In our Rome to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BMW iX2 eDrive20 by 135 minutes, completing the 1853km route in 22h 1min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 1min (135 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 2h 5min
- Energy: ~302 kWh
- Distance: 1853km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BMW iX2 eDrive20 |
| Travel time |
22h 1min |
24h 16min |
| Charging time: |
2h 5min |
3h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~334 kWh |
~339 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (12 min, 15% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Martinci (21 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (72 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
BMW iX2 eDrive20 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Via del Lago (10 min, 16% → 42%)
-
Stop 2:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 3:
Vega (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (11 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 5:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (12 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 6:
Petrol (13 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (22 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesla Supercharger (12 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Martinci (11 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 10:
JP Putevi Srbije (38 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 11:
Lidl Bulevardul Mihai Viteazul (29 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 12:
Kaufland (45 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 135-minute advantage over BMW iX2 eDrive20 on this 1853km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 5min vs 3h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~302 kWh vs ~330 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons