In our Rome to Budapest EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 69 minutes, completing the 1197km route in 12h 5min. The key advantage? Faster charging speeds. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
Despite costing 37,430 less, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 69 minutes on this route.
The Tesla Model S 2023's 505km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model 3 Performance's 424km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Performance
- Total time: 12h 5min (69 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 46min
- Energy: ~212 kWh
- Distance: 1197km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
12h 5min |
13h 14min |
| Charging time: |
46min |
1h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~215 kWh |
~217 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (13 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Tepanje east (Celje - Maribor) (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Balatonkeresztúr (Richtung Budapest) (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (33 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Centro Commerciale Adriatico2 (34 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (11 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger István Parkhotel (18 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Tesla Model 3 Performance Won
The Tesla Model 3 Performance achieved a 69-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 1197km route. Key factors:
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 46min vs 1h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~212 kWh vs ~225 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons