In our Rome to Budapest EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Vinfast VF9 by 23 minutes, completing the 1197km route in 12h 5min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 26, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Vinfast VF9's 475km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model 3 Performance's 424km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model 3 Performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Performance
- Total time: 12h 5min (23 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 46min
- Energy: ~212 kWh
- Distance: 1197km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
Vinfast VF9 |
| Travel time |
12h 5min |
12h 28min |
| Charging time: |
46min |
1h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~215 kWh |
~219 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (13 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Tepanje east (Celje - Maribor) (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Balatonkeresztúr (Richtung Budapest) (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Vinfast VF9 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (11 min, 17% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (15 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (10 min, 10% → 16%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Four Points by Sheraton (11 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 5:
Maribor vzhod (15 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Balatonkeresztúr (Richtung Budapest) (15 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Tesla Model 3 Performance Won
The Tesla Model 3 Performance achieved a 23-minute advantage over Vinfast VF9 on this 1197km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 46min vs 1h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~212 kWh vs ~310 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons