In our Rome to Budapest EV duel, the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 6 minutes, completing the 1196km route in 11h 53min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance's 512km range doesn't beat the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025's 432km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025
- Total time: 11h 53min (6 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~255 kWh
- Distance: 1196km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
11h 53min |
11h 59min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
40min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~215 kWh |
~215 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 15% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 3:
Petrol Murska Sobota jug (14 min, 10% → 77%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Tepanje east (Celje - Maribor) (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Balatonkeresztúr (Richtung Budapest) (10 min, 11% → 55%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 Won
The XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 achieved a 6-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1196km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons