In our Rome to Copenhagen EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the smart electric drive by 5483 minutes, completing the 1880km route in 21h 12min. The key advantage? 27 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model 3 Performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 35 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Performance
- Total time: 21h 12min (5483 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 37min
- Energy: ~333 kWh
- Distance: 1880km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
smart electric drive |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
| Travel time |
112h 35min |
21h 12min |
| Charging time: |
90h 1min |
1h 37min |
| Charging stops: |
35 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~338 kWh |
~343 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
smart electric drive Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Centro Commerciale La Palma (186 min, 12% → 84%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Fabro Est (197 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
Badia al Pino Est (96 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Est (212 min, 10% → 91%)
-
Stop 5:
Via del Lago (179 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 6:
Cantagallo Est (127 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Secchia Est (153 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 8:
Enel Mantova Village (181 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 9:
Affi Lago di Garda Sud (204 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 10:
Dolomiti Energia Via Fersina (176 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 11:
NOI Techpark Alto Adige (142 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 12:
Mautstation Brixen-Pustertal (114 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 13:
Raststätte Lanz Plessi Museum (168 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 14:
Destination Charger Krumers Alpin Resort (163 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 15:
Sparkasse (132 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 16:
Mercedes-Benz Niederlassung (108 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 17:
Fürholzen Ost (181 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 18:
Köschinger Forst Ost (85 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 19:
Rathaus (171 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 20:
Landratsamt Nürnberger Land (189 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 21:
Motor Nützel Nürnberger Straße (194 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 22:
Hirschberg (173 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 23:
Verwaltungsgemeinschaft (197 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 24:
Globana Airport Hotel (184 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 25:
Hotel Fichtenbreite (88 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 26:
Schloßstraße (199 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 27:
Obeta electro (116 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 28:
Bahnhof (101 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 29:
Bahnhof (155 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 30:
Fischweg (104 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 31:
Raststätte Recknitz Ost (116 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 32:
Parkplatz P2 Seehafen (199 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 33:
Væggerløsehallen (145 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 34:
Clever Ladesäule (181 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 35:
Rastplatz Øst (85 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Copenhagen
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Arno Est (10 min, 47% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Povegliano Est (14 min, 15% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Raststätte Lanz - Brenner (18 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Langenbruck A9 (12 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Münchberg Autohaus Hahn (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Burger King Autohof Bitterfeld (12 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Autohof Herzsprung (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Copenhagen
Why the Tesla Model 3 Performance Won
The Tesla Model 3 Performance achieved a 5483-minute advantage over smart electric drive on this 1880km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 35 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 37min vs 90h 1min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~333 kWh vs ~346 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons