In our Rome to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi SQ6 e-tron by 36 minutes, completing the 2810km route in 32h 43min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 32h 43min (36 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 1h 51min
- Energy: ~459 kWh
- Distance: 2810km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi SQ6 e-tron |
| Travel time |
32h 43min |
33h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 51min |
2h 18min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~506 kWh |
~505 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (13 min, 17% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Föhrenberg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (13 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Factory Annopol (23 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Neste (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 9:
Neste Niidu (10 min, 16% → 57%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Audi SQ6 e-tron Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (13 min, 21% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesco (17 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Factory Annopol (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (27 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Circle K (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 36-minute advantage over Audi SQ6 e-tron on this 2810km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 51min vs 2h 18min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~459 kWh vs ~553 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons