In our Rome to London EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model 3 Performance by 22 minutes, completing the 1757km route in 19h 0min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 0min (22 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 59min
- Energy: ~287 kWh
- Distance: 1757km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
| Travel time |
19h 0min |
19h 22min |
| Charging time: |
59min |
1h 21min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~316 kWh |
~316 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Secchia Est (11 min, 24% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Lavorgo Nord (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rue de la Madeleine (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Champ Roland (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: London
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 18% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Lavorgo Nord (10 min, 19% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastplatz Eggberg A2 (16 min, 19% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Toul Dommartin (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Champ Roland (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Hilaire Cottes (14 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 22-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 Performance on this 1757km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 59min vs 1h 21min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~287 kWh vs ~311 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons