In our Rome to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 50 e-tron by 44 minutes, completing the 1925km route in 19h 59min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 59min (44 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~314 kWh
- Distance: 1925km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 50 e-tron |
| Travel time |
19h 59min |
20h 43min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
1h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~347 kWh |
~346 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Brugnato Est (10 min, 20% → 28%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Sant'Ilario Nord (11 min, 16% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Gigean Nord (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 7:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (10 min, 25% → 64%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Audi Q4 50 e-tron Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Versilia Est (21 min, 11% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Castellaro Nord (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Bréguières Nord (11 min, 11% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Lançon de Provence Est (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Gigean Nord (10 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
ANDGO (17 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Vila Sana (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Ariza Norte (13 min, 12% → 57%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 44-minute advantage over Audi Q4 50 e-tron on this 1925km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 1h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~314 kWh vs ~380 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons