In our Rome to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BYD Seal U Design by 80 minutes, completing the 1925km route in 19h 59min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 59min (80 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~314 kWh
- Distance: 1925km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BYD Seal U Design |
| Travel time |
19h 59min |
21h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
2h 29min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~347 kWh |
~347 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Brugnato Est (10 min, 20% → 28%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Sant'Ilario Nord (11 min, 16% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Gigean Nord (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 7:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (10 min, 25% → 64%)
- Arrival: Madrid
BYD Seal U Design Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Parcheggio del Cimitero (27 min, 17% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Rinovo Nord (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (17 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Rue John Mac Adam (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Gasparets (21 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Vila Sana (14 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Ariza Norte (18 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 80-minute advantage over BYD Seal U Design on this 1925km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 2h 29min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~314 kWh vs ~419 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons