In our Rome to Madrid EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi RS e-tron GT by 69 minutes, completing the 1922km route in 20h 2min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 2min (69 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 13min
- Energy: ~353 kWh
- Distance: 1922km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi RS e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
20h 2min |
21h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 13min |
2h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~346 kWh |
~347 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Parcheggio del Cimitero (10 min, 31% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Rinovo Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Nabrigas (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
ANDGO (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Audi RS e-tron GT Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ristorante Goyo (15 min, 19% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Sant'Ilario Nord (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Castellaro Nord (12 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Bréguières Nord (13 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Lançon de Provence Est (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Gigean Nord (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
ANDGO (20 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Vila Sana (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 9:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Ariza Norte (16 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 69-minute advantage over Audi RS e-tron GT on this 1922km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 13min vs 2h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~353 kWh vs ~430 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons