In our Rome to Madrid EV duel, the Audi S6 Avant e-tron beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 3 minutes, completing the 1922km route in 19h 59min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi S6 Avant e-tron needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi S6 Avant e-tron
- Total time: 19h 59min (3 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 12min
- Energy: ~349 kWh
- Distance: 1922km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi S6 Avant e-tron |
| Travel time |
20h 2min |
19h 59min |
| Charging time: |
1h 13min |
1h 12min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~346 kWh |
~346 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Parcheggio del Cimitero (10 min, 31% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Rinovo Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Nabrigas (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
ANDGO (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Audi S6 Avant e-tron Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Parcheggio del Cimitero (10 min, 34% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Rinovo Nord (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (11 min, 22% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Béziers Montblanc Nord (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger El Cisne (15 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi S6 Avant e-tron Won
The Audi S6 Avant e-tron achieved a 3-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1922km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 12min vs 1h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~349 kWh vs ~353 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons