In our Rome to Munich EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 16 minutes, completing the 897km route in 8h 59min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 59min (16 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 21min
- Energy: ~140 kWh
- Distance: 897km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
8h 59min |
9h 15min |
| Charging time: |
21min |
38min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~161 kWh |
~161 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Povegliano Est (10 min, 16% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (11 min, 16% → 52%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Campogalliano Est (18 min, 16% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
Al Tornante Panorama Restaurant & Pizzeria (10 min, 11% → 36%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 16-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 897km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 21min vs 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~140 kWh vs ~156 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons