In our Rome to Munich EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 42 minutes, completing the 899km route in 8h 58min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023
- Total time: 8h 58min (42 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~135 kWh
- Distance: 899km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 |
| Travel time |
9h 40min |
8h 58min |
| Charging time: |
1h 1min |
20min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~162 kWh |
~161 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 24% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 16% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Povegliano Est (19 min, 11% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Al Tornante Panorama Restaurant & Pizzeria (12 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Munich
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Povegliano Est (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 15% → 55%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 Won
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 achieved a 42-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 899km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 1h 1min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~135 kWh vs ~143 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons