In our Rome to Munich EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the Tesla Model X 2023 by 31 minutes, completing the 902km route in 9h 3min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model X 2023's 460km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 9h 3min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 25min
- Energy: ~159 kWh
- Distance: 902km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model X 2023 |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
9h 34min |
9h 3min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
25min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~162 kWh |
~161 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model X 2023 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Hotel Real Fini Baia Del Re (16 min, 13% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger B&B Hotel (11 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Raststätte Lanz - Brenner (15 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Munich
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Campogalliano Est (12 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (13 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 31-minute advantage over Tesla Model X 2023 on this 902km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 25min vs 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~159 kWh vs ~186 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons