In our Rome to Paris EV duel, the Ford Capri Extended Range beats the Citroën ë-Berlingo by 127 minutes, completing the 1433km route in 14h 42min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Ford Capri Extended Range needs only 6 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Ford Capri Extended Range
- Total time: 14h 42min (127 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~235 kWh
- Distance: 1433km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Citroën ë-Berlingo |
Ford Capri Extended Range |
| Travel time |
16h 49min |
14h 42min |
| Charging time: |
3h 2min |
1h 16min |
| Charging stops: |
13 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~258 kWh |
~256 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Citroën ë-Berlingo Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Badia al Pino Est (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Ristorante Goyo (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Cantagallo Est (17 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Roadhouse (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
Villarboit Nord (12 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Parcheggio viale Rimembranza (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
Funivia Skyway (11 min, 14% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières (29 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 10:
Mâcon Supercharger (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 11:
Aire du Creux-Moreau (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 12:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 13:
IONITY Aire de Darvault (11 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Paris
Ford Capri Extended Range Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (13 min, 18% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (13 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Ambreuil (13 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (13 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Ford Capri Extended Range Won
The Ford Capri Extended Range achieved a 127-minute advantage over Citroën ë-Berlingo on this 1433km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 3h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~235 kWh vs ~289 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons