In our Rome to Paris EV duel, the Peugeot e-308 beats the Opel Ampera-e by 126 minutes, completing the 1428km route in 15h 58min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Opel Ampera-e's 338km range doesn't beat the Peugeot e-308's 320km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Peugeot e-308 needs only 9 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Peugeot e-308
- Total time: 15h 58min (126 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 23min
- Energy: ~205 kWh
- Distance: 1428km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Opel Ampera-e |
Peugeot e-308 |
| Travel time |
18h 4min |
15h 58min |
| Charging time: |
4h 31min |
2h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~257 kWh |
~258 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Opel Ampera-e Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (15 min, 26% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (37 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport (37 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
#IoVadoAMetano (20 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne (32 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières (37 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Mâcon Supercharger (24 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire du Creux-Moreau (28 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (22 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Aire de Darvault (19 min, 10% → 34%)
- Arrival: Paris
Peugeot e-308 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 24% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (12 min, 11% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Roadhouse (13 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Via Rasario (23 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne (17 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Bourg Jasseron (22 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
Mobilize Lounge Avia (18 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de la Couline (16 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Peugeot e-308 Won
The Peugeot e-308 achieved a 126-minute advantage over Opel Ampera-e on this 1428km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 23min vs 4h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~205 kWh vs ~253 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons