In our Rome to Paris EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Performance beats the Tesla Model S 100 by 261 minutes, completing the 1445km route in 14h 30min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model S 100's 488km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Performance's 411km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Performance
- Total time: 14h 30min (261 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~264 kWh
- Distance: 1445km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model S 100 |
Tesla Model Y Performance |
| Travel time |
18h 51min |
14h 30min |
| Charging time: |
4h 30min |
1h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~260 kWh |
~256 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model S 100 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Via Lungo Arno (39 min, 28% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Hotel Real Fini Baia Del Re (26 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Autotorino (33 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Golf Club Cavaglià (25 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Carrefour (10 min, 10% → 32%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Best Western Porte Sud De Genève (33 min, 13% → 76%)
-
Stop 7:
Engie Aire de Beaune-Merceuil (54 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (40 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Novotel (10 min, 10% → 32%)
- Arrival: Paris
Tesla Model Y Performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (14 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières (10 min, 17% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Ambreuil (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (10 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Tesla Model Y Performance Won
The Tesla Model Y Performance achieved a 261-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 100 on this 1445km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 4h 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~264 kWh vs ~266 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons