In our Rome to Paris EV duel, the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 beats the Tesla Model 3 Performance by 20 minutes, completing the 1423km route in 14h 6min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025
- Total time: 14h 6min (20 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~303 kWh
- Distance: 1423km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
| Travel time |
14h 6min |
14h 26min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
1h 0min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~256 kWh |
~256 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 15% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (10 min, 20% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières (10 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire des Lochères (10 min, 11% → 73%)
- Arrival: Paris
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 18% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne (10 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières (10 min, 20% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Ambreuil (10 min, 13% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (10 min, 13% → 52%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 Won
The XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 achieved a 20-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 Performance on this 1423km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 1h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons