In our Rome to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Capri Extended Range AWD by 23 minutes, completing the 1303km route in 12h 45min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 45min (23 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 37min
- Energy: ~213 kWh
- Distance: 1303km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Capri Extended Range AWD |
| Travel time |
12h 45min |
13h 8min |
| Charging time: |
37min |
1h 1min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~235 kWh |
~230 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Electra Mantova Village (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (17 min, 11% → 74%)
- Arrival: Prague
Ford Capri Extended Range AWD Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Arno Est (10 min, 47% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Povegliano Est (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (13 min, 12% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's Defreggerweg (18 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 23-minute advantage over Ford Capri Extended Range AWD on this 1303km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 37min vs 1h 1min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~213 kWh vs ~224 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons